Data Suspension

Taking our classic ViewModel, we are going to decide what is important to save upon application death/resume. We specifically do not save the state of commands because they are recreated by the CTOR.

It's debatable if you were to keep the Search Results (maybe that's a concern of your Akavache implementation)

But DEFINITELY you want to save the SearchQuery, as when that is rehydrated it should restore the viewmodel to the exact state it was in..

public class SearchViewModel : ISearchViewModel
    public ReactiveList<SearchResults> SearchResults { get; set; }

    private string searchQuery;
    public string SearchQuery {
        get { return searchQuery; }
        set { this.RaiseAndSetIfChanged(ref searchQuery, value); }


    public ReactiveCommand<List<SearchResults>> Search { get; set; }

    public ISearchService SearchService { get; set; }


Make sure you [IgnoreDataMember] the HostScreen or you will get a circular reference.

phil.cleveland [1:57 PM] 
@paulcbetts: Cool.  Do I do that for every VM?

paulcbetts [2:07 PM] 

phil.cleveland [2:08 PM] 
Cool.  Cleaning it all up now. Adding serialization and IViewFor to CB

phil.cleveland [2:09 PM]
Other than the [Attributes] does it all just work Magically?

paulcbetts [2:14 PM] 

paulcbetts [2:14 PM]
Well, kinda

paulcbetts [2:14 PM]
ViewModel serialization is Tricky Business

paulcbetts [2:14 PM]
You have to decide what to serialize and what to recreate

paulcbetts [2:14 PM]
Some stuff you should recalculate / reload when the app wakes up instead of trying to save it out

phil.cleveland [2:16 PM] 
Ok.  The one I am really thinking about now is a timer.  I have a screen with a count down timer and notifications.  So even if the app goes away I want that timer running.

paulcbetts [2:16 PM] 
Hm, Android definitely won't let you do that directly

paulcbetts [2:16 PM]
Your app will eventually get knocked out

paulcbetts [2:17 PM]
You need what's called a "Service" to do that

phil.cleveland [2:17 PM] 
hmm.  Well...I guess I could at least store the timestamp for start.....

phil.cleveland [2:17 PM]
Ok.  I'll look into it

paulcbetts [2:17 PM] 
^^ that works

phil.cleveland [2:17 PM] 
I mean the standard clock that comes with....does more or less what I want

paulcbetts [2:17 PM] 
Oh wait, maybe you don't - there's a built-in API to wake your own app up at certain times as I recall (edited)

phil.cleveland [2:18 PM] 
Oh...that would be cool.  If I could set a promise so to speak.  Like ...hey come talk to me in 20 minutes.

kentcb [2:20 PM] 
@paulcbetts: (regarding a conversation yesterday) I always thought the thing `ObservableForProperty` could do that `WhenAny` can not is specify `beforeChange`. That is, be notified about the old value that is about to be swapped out for the new.

kentcb [2:20 PM]
I use this quite a bit to proactively clean up disposable stuff

kentcb [2:21 PM]
```public SomeDisposableType Property
    // usual get/set here

// elsewhere
    .ObservableForProperty(x => x.Property, beforeChange: true)
    .Where(x => x != null)
    .Subscribe(x => x.Dispose());

kentcb [2:21 PM]
is this doable with `WhenAnyValue` somehow?

phil.cleveland [2:22 PM] 
could you use WhenActivated?

kentcb [2:22 PM] 
it's not necessarily about activation - more for when some disposable instance is being swapped out for another

paulcbetts [2:23 PM] 
You should use `SerialDisposable` instead

paulcbetts [2:23 PM]
It'll change your life :simple_smile:

kentcb [2:24 PM] 
I see, so just assign the new instance to the `SerialDisposable`

phil.cleveland [2:24 PM] 
Oh man.  I just learned comes along a trump

paulcbetts [2:24 PM] 
@kentcb: Got it

kentcb [2:24 PM] 
hmm, very cool - different way of thinking about it

paulcbetts [2:25 PM] 
`this.WhenAnyValue(x => x.MyDisposableProp).Subscribe(x => latestDisposableProp.Disposable = x);  // Trashes the old one on assign

paulcbetts [2:26 PM] 
```this.WhenAnyValue(x => x.MyDisposableProp)
    .Subscribe(x => latestDisposableProp.Disposable = x != null ? x : Disposable.Empty);

kentcb [2:27 PM] 

phil.cleveland [2:27 PM] 
So would this be something you would do for instance VM1 has a ReactiveObject prop which changes based on state?

kentcb [2:29 PM] 
is it disposable though?

phil.cleveland [2:30 PM] 
The VM....I guess in this particular case no

phil.cleveland [2:31 PM]2:31
I guess I don't impl IDisposable that often TBH.  Wonder if I am missing some leaks

kentcb [2:34 PM] 
I've gotten into the practice of following *any* call to `Subscribe` or `Connect` or `Bind` et cetera with my own `AddTo` extension:
```this.someProperty = this.WhenAnyValue(x => x.SomeProperty)
.Select(x => x == null)
.ToProperty(this, x => x.SomeOtherProperty)

kentcb [2:34 PM]
and `AddTo` is an extension method that adds any `IDisposable` to a `CompositeDisposable`

kentcb [2:34 PM]
and it's the `CompositeDisposable` that I dispose of

phil.cleveland [2:35 PM] 
Per a discussion with Paul the other day I think that is only necessary in the code behind

kentcb [2:35 PM] 
in my `Dispose()`

phil.cleveland [2:35 PM] 
Yea @kentcb I saw your DisposableReactiveObject in the excercise app.  I think that could be part of RxUI

phil.cleveland [2:36 PM]
I actually think that looks cleaner than using the WhenActivated too.  Again I might be misunderstanding when each is appropriate

phil.cleveland [2:37 PM]
this is what my CB WhenAny's look like
```this.WhenActivated (d => {
            d (this.WhenAnyValue (x => x.ViewModel.AnticipatedWortLossVolume).Subscribe (x => this.stpWortLoss.Value = x));

phil.cleveland [2:38 PM]
the curlys and parens can cause a headache sometimes

kentcb [2:43 PM] 
yeah, could be a little neater with an extension method:
    d => this
            .WhenAnyValue(x => x.ViewModel.AnticipatedWortLossVolume)
            .Subscribe(x => this.stpWortLoss.Value = x)
(just using `AddTo` as example name - might be able to come up with a better one) (edited)

kentcb [2:45 PM]
am a little surprised that `WhenActivated` doesn't have an overload giving you a `CompositeDisposable`. That would make things a bit easier

rdavisau [2:56 PM] 
^ I have used that approach too, @kentcb

paulcbetts [3:03 PM] 
So, the rule is, you only have to dispose subscriptions if the thing you're subscribing to outlives your own object, and your Observable never ends (edited)

paulcbetts [3:04 PM]
If you're an item in a ListView, and you subscribe to something on MainWindow, you need to Dispose it

paulcbetts [3:05 PM]
Unfortunately, DependencyObjects use static properties everywhere to back everything and they suck

paulcbetts [3:05 PM]
So, _all_ subscriptions that go through DependencyProperties are effectively scoped to the same as App (i.e. forever)

paulcbetts [3:06 PM]
So, Rule #2 is, if you WhenAny through a DependencyProperty, you need to Dispose it

phil.cleveland [3:06 PM] 
So that makes sense why pretty much all the WhenAny's in the code behind require it

paulcbetts [3:06 PM] 
Nailed it

phil.cleveland [3:09 PM] 
Anyone know if there is there the equivelent of Break on Any Exception in Xam Studio.  Really hard to debug sometimes.  Just adding a StartsWith  is crashing me, but I am not sure why

results matching ""

    No results matching ""